Grace, salvation and the saints

Assurance

Can a Christian know he is saved? The four traditions answer differently, and the difference is pastoral before it is theological.

You are reading the brief version. Switch the depth control to Complete for the full treatment.

Can you know you are saved?

This is where the doctrine of justification stops being abstract. A man lying awake at three in the morning is not asking whether dikaioo means declare or make. He is asking whether it is all right.

The four traditions answer differently, and each answer is shaped by a fear.

Lutheran: yes, with certainty - because assurance rests on God's promise attached to something outside you. Not on your feelings, not on your progress, but on your baptism, the absolution spoken to you, and the body and blood put into your hand. The fear being guarded against is a conscience turned in on itself.

Anglican: broadly yes, with the same grounding in the promises and the sacraments, though the Articles speak more of the comfort of the doctrine than of certainty as such, and Anglican pastoral writing warns against both presumption and despair.

Catholic: a firm and reasonable hope rather than the certainty of faith. Trent denies that anyone can know with the certainty of faith that he is in a state of grace, absent private revelation. The fear being guarded against is presumption - a man convinced he is saved while living as he pleases.

Orthodox: the question is largely declined. Salvation is not a status secured at a point in time but a life being healed, so asking whether one is saved is like asking a convalescent whether he is well. The proper posture is hope, repentance and the sacraments, and the saints' own testimony runs towards humility rather than confidence.

What none of them teaches is that you should be paralysed by fear, or that God is reluctant. All four locate assurance in what God has done and given, not in the quality of your religious experience.

Why the question matters

The Reformation began in a monastery cell with a man who could not get peace.

Luther did everything the system offered. He fasted, confessed obsessively - his confessor grew exasperated - kept the hours, went on pilgrimage. And the more seriously he took it, the worse it got, because every act of penance raised the question of whether it had been sincere enough, and every confession raised the question of whether he had remembered everything.

His breakthrough was to see that the righteousness of God in Romans 1:17 is not the standard God demands but the righteousness God gives. And with that, assurance became possible: not because he had become good, but because the verdict did not depend on his becoming good.

That biography matters, because the Lutheran doctrine of assurance is not a theological preference. It is a rescue, designed by a man who nearly drowned.

Pause and thinkPause: the Catholic and Lutheran positions are each guarding against a real danger. Name both dangers, and say which one you think is more common today.

The texts

The passages cut both ways, and an honest treatment says so.

For assurance:

These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life (1 John 5:13). The stated purpose of the letter is that its readers may know.
There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus (Romans 8:1).
I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life... shall be able to separate us from the love of God (Romans 8:38-39).
My sheep hear my voice... neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand (John 10:27-28).
The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God (Romans 8:16).

For caution:

Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling (Philippians 2:12).
Let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall (1 Corinthians 10:12).
I keep under my body... lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway (1 Corinthians 9:27) - Paul, about himself.
It is impossible for those who were once enlightened... if they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance (Hebrews 6:4-6).
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom (Matthew 7:21).

Any doctrine of assurance has to hold both sets. A position built only on the first list becomes presumption; one built only on the second becomes torment.

Where assurance is found

Here the four converge more than their formal positions suggest, because all of them locate assurance outside the believer's own state.

Ask the practical question: what do you look at when you doubt?

If the answer is my faith, you are in trouble, because faith felt strong on Tuesday and feels like nothing today. If the answer is my progress, you are in worse trouble, because an honest person's progress is uneven and the more sensitive he is the more failure he sees.

The traditions point elsewhere:

To baptism. Something was done to you, on a date, by God, witnessed by others. It does not fluctuate. Luther's counsel was to say I am baptised - in the present tense, about a past event.
To absolution. Words spoken to you, out loud, by a minister acting in Christ's name. Not a feeling you generated.
To the Eucharist. Christ's body placed into your hand. You did not imagine it and you cannot argue yourself out of it.
To the promise itself. Him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out (John 6:37). The question is not whether you feel accepted but whether He lied.

Where the four traditions stand

Catholic

The Council of Trent (Session 6, Chapter 9 and Canons 13-16) teaches that no one can know with the certainty of faith, which admits no falsehood, that he has obtained the grace of God, unless by special revelation. Trent's target was the claim that a person must believe with certainty that his sins are forgiven in order to be justified - a formulation the council read as making subjective conviction the condition of grace. What the Church affirms instead is a firm hope: the Catechism teaches that hope is the theological virtue by which we desire the kingdom and place our trust in Christ's promises, relying not on our own strength but on the help of the Holy Spirit. This is not anxiety. Catholic spiritual writing warns against scrupulosity as a spiritual illness and treats despair as a graver sin than presumption, since it denies God's mercy. The practical structure is: rely on the sacraments, examine your conscience without morbidity, confess, and hope. Certainty is withheld; confidence is not.

Orthodox

Orthodoxy finds the question itself Western in shape. Salvation is not a legal status conferred at a moment but the healing of a sick nature and growth into communion with God - a process begun in baptism and continuing beyond death. To ask whether one is saved is, in the Eastern idiom, like asking a man in the middle of a long convalescence whether he is well. The characteristic answer, if pressed, is I have been saved, I am being saved, and I hope to be saved. The saints' testimony runs consistently towards humility: Sisoes the Great, dying with his face shining, asks for more time to repent. Orthodox spirituality cultivates penthos, compunction - a grief over sin that is not despair but is not complacency either - alongside an unshakeable confidence in God's love for mankind, philanthropia, which the liturgy proclaims continually. Assurance is found in the sacraments and in the Church, not in introspection, and Orthodoxy is markedly suspicious of experiences of certainty, treating them under the heading of prelest - spiritual delusion.

Lutheran

Assurance is central, and it is the practical pay-off of the whole Lutheran system. Because justification is a declaration resting on Christ's righteousness rather than on the believer's condition, its certainty does not depend on the believer's condition either. The Apology of the Augsburg Confession argues that a faith which does not dare to be certain of forgiveness is not faith at all but doubt, and that the medieval requirement to remain uncertain made the conscience worse. The Confessions locate assurance firmly in the means of grace: the word, baptism, absolution and the Supper - all external, all datable, none dependent on the believer's mood. Luther's own counsel is the tradition's hallmark. When the devil accuses you, he wrote, do not argue about your merits; say I am baptised, and I believe in Jesus Christ. And in a letter to a struggling friend: when you cannot believe, let the sacrament be your believing. Lutherans reject the Reformed doctrine of the perseverance of the saints - a believer can fall away - which means assurance is real but is not a guarantee independent of continuing in faith.

Anglican

Article 11 calls justification by faith only a doctrine most wholesome and very full of comfort, and the comfort is the point. Article 17, on predestination, contains the most striking Anglican pastoral writing in the formularies: the godly consideration of predestination is full of sweet, pleasant and unspeakable comfort to godly persons, but for curious and carnal persons to have continually before their eyes the sentence of God's predestination is a most dangerous downfall. The Article then counsels that we must receive God's promises as they are generally set forth to us in Holy Scripture - that is, look at the promise rather than at the decree. The Prayer Book builds assurance into the liturgy through the Comfortable Words read after the absolution at Holy Communion: Come unto me all that travail and are heavy laden, and I will refresh you; God so loved the world; this is a true saying, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners. In practice the evangelical wing preaches assurance in Lutheran terms; the Anglo-Catholic wing is closer to the Catholic reticence; the Prayer Book's own instinct is to answer doubt with promises read aloud rather than with a doctrine of certainty.

Where modern denominations differ

Who differs: Reformed, Presbyterian, and most Baptist and non-denominational churches teach the perseverance of the saints - popularly once saved, always saved - that a truly regenerate person cannot finally fall away. Wesleyan and Pentecostal churches teach the opposite with equal firmness: salvation can be lost by apostasy or persistent sin. So the traditions outside the four are divided on this more sharply than the four are among themselves.

What they hold: The Reformed argument is that if salvation is entirely God's work and He has chosen the elect, He will certainly complete it - Philippians 1:6, John 10:28, Romans 8:30 - and that anyone who falls away demonstrates he was never truly regenerate (1 John 2:19). The popular evangelical version often detaches this from Reformed theology altogether and attaches assurance to a remembered moment: a prayer prayed, a card signed, a date in a Bible flyleaf.

How to answer the Reformed position: treat it with respect, because its texts are real and its instinct - that God finishes what He starts - is sound. The four traditions' reply is the warning passages, which are numerous and are addressed to believers: Hebrews 6 and 10, the branches cut out of the vine in John 15, Paul's fear of being himself a castaway, and the letters to the seven churches. The reply that such people were never truly regenerate makes the doctrine unfalsifiable - anyone who perseveres was elect, anyone who does not never was - and it relocates assurance in exactly the place it was meant to escape, since the believer must now ask whether his faith is the true kind or the temporary kind.

How to answer the popular version: this is the more urgent pastoral problem, because it produces people who are certain they are saved on the basis of a prayer said at a summer camp in 1994 and who have had no religious life since. Ask what Matthew 7:21 means - not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord - and what Christ means when He says I never knew you to people who prophesied in His name. Then offer something better rather than only taking something away: the four traditions do not ground assurance in a remembered decision, because memory is unreliable and moments fade. They ground it in a baptism that happened, an absolution that is spoken again whenever you need it, and a sacrament you receive this Sunday. That is not less assurance. It is assurance that does not have to be maintained by remembering hard enough.

Work with it

Check yourself

Where do all four traditions locate the ground of assurance?

Check yourself

What does the Council of Trent actually deny about assurance?

Check yourself

What is the Orthodox characteristic answer to "are you saved?"

Objection drill

Once saved, always saved. If salvation depends even partly on my continuing, then it depends on me, and grace is not grace. Philippians 1:6 says he who began a good work in you will complete it. John 10:28 says no one can pluck them out of his hand. Your churches keep people permanently insecure so they keep coming back.

Write your answer first. You will remember it far better than one you only read.

A model answer

The last sentence is a charge of bad faith and should be set aside - not because it is unthinkable that religious institutions have used fear, but because it is not an argument, and the people who hold these positions include the ones who were most determined to remove fear from Christian life.

Now the substance, and let me give the position its due first. The instinct behind it is right: God finishes what He starts, salvation is His work, and a gospel that leaves the believer's final state hanging on his own stamina is not good news. Philippians 1:6 and John 10:28-29 say what they say, and no tradition covered here explains them away. All four affirm that no external power can pluck a believer from Christ's hand.

The difficulty is the warning passages, and there are a great many of them, addressed to Christians.

Hebrews 6:4-6 describes people who were enlightened, tasted the heavenly gift, were made partakers of the Holy Spirit, and then fell away. Hebrews 10:26-29 speaks of one who was sanctified by the blood of the covenant and then counts it an unholy thing. John 15 has branches in the vine that do not abide and are cut off and burned. Paul fears that he himself, having preached to others, might be a castaway - which is a strange anxiety for a man who believed his final state was settled. Romans 11 warns Gentile believers that if God did not spare the natural branches, He may not spare them either. And the letters to the seven churches threaten the removal of lampstands.

The standard reply, from 1 John 2:19 - they went out from us, but they were not of us - is a serious argument and deserves an answer rather than a dismissal. But notice the cost of it. It makes the doctrine impossible to test: whoever perseveres was elect, whoever does not never truly was. And it relocates uncertainty to exactly the spot the doctrine was meant to clear. The believer can no longer ask am I saved? - he must ask is my faith the genuine kind or the temporary kind that Hebrews describes? That is a harder question, not an easier one, and the introspection it demands is the very thing Luther was trying to escape.

The four traditions' answer is to hold both sets of texts without resolving them into a system. Yes, no power can separate you from Christ - and you can walk away. Those are not contradictory unless you assume a person's will is one of the external forces that might pluck him. The traditions treat apostasy as a real possibility precisely because the relationship is real, and relationships can be abandoned.

And here is where the practical question turns around. Ask what your assurance is resting on. If it rests on a conclusion you have drawn about your own regeneration

that your faith is the genuine article - then it rests on your assessment of

yourself, which is the least reliable instrument you own.

The four traditions offer something sturdier. You were baptised: God acted, on a date, and it does not depend on how you feel this morning. You can hear absolution spoken to you today, out loud, about the specific thing you did. You can receive Christ's body this Sunday, put into your hand by someone else. None of that requires you to remember a moment correctly or to correctly diagnose the quality of your faith.

That is not insecurity. It is assurance that comes from outside you and is re-delivered every week - which is exactly what a person who doubts himself needs, and it is available on the days when the remembered prayer at summer camp is no help at all.

Memory work

Turn each card over, then say honestly whether you knew it. Cards you miss come back sooner.

I have worked through this section