The Modern Church
Zwingli, the Puritans and the first Baptists
Where the "memorial" Lord's Supper, worship stripped to what Scripture commands, and the Baptist churches actually came from.
You are reading the brief version. Switch the depth control to Complete for the full treatment.
Three beliefs that most evangelical Christians now take for granted trace back to the Swiss and English Reformation rather than to the early Church.
The Lord's Supper as a memorial. The idea that the bread and wine are only reminders of Christ's death, and that "this is my body" means "this signifies my body", was taught by Huldrych Zwingli in Zürich from 1524-25, building on a letter by the Dutch lawyer Cornelius Hoen. At the Marburg Colloquy in October 1529, Luther and Zwingli agreed on fourteen of fifteen articles and divided on this one. Luther wrote Hoc est corpus meum - "This is my body" - in chalk on the table and would not move from it.
Worship limited to what Scripture commands. The Reformed "regulative principle" holds that nothing may be done in worship unless Scripture commands it. The Puritans applied it to the Church of England, rejecting the Prayer Book, vestments, kneeling at communion, the sign of the cross at baptism, and in time the church year itself. Parliament abolished Christmas in 1647.
The Baptist churches. John Smyth, a Church of England clergyman turned Separatist, baptised himself and his congregation in Amsterdam in 1609. Thomas Helwys brought the group back to London in 1612, founding the first Baptist church in England, and died in Newgate prison after pleading with King James for liberty of conscience.
It matters to be fair here. The Reformed churches of Calvin, Knox and the Westminster Confession are not "modern" in the sense of the rest of this section. They baptise infants, confess the Nicene Creed, and Calvin himself rejected Zwingli's bare memorial view, teaching that believers truly feed on Christ by the Spirit. But Zwingli's memorialism, the Puritan pruning of worship, and the Baptist fusion of believer's baptism with gathered churches are the soil in which most modern evangelical worship grew.
The four traditions all reject the memorial-only view. The Augsburg Confession teaches that Christ's body and blood "are truly present"; the Council of Trent condemns those who say Christ is in the sacrament "only as in a sign"; the Thirty-Nine Articles insist the Supper is "not only a sign" but "a partaking of the Body of Christ"; the Orthodox Synod of Jerusalem in 1672 rejected the Reformed view outright.
Verdict: the memorial Supper is a sixteenth-century innovation, unknown to the Fathers, who wrote that the Eucharist "is the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ".
What is believed
Three distinct beliefs belong to this topic, and modern evangelicals usually hold all three without knowing they have separate histories.
The memorial view of the Lord's Supper. As a Baptist or non-denominational Christian would put it: the Lord's Supper is an ordinance Christ commanded so that we would remember His death. The bread and the cup are symbols. Christ is present with His people as He always is, by His Spirit, but not in the bread and wine. "This is my body" is a figure of speech, like "I am the door".
The regulative principle of worship. As a Reformed Christian would put it: God alone decides how He is to be worshipped. Whatever Scripture does not command in worship is forbidden. Human traditions - set prayers, vestments, holy days, images, in stricter forms even instruments and hymns not drawn from the Psalms - are additions to God's word and should be removed.
Baptist ecclesiology. As a Baptist would put it: the Church is made up of those who have personally believed and been baptised by immersion as believers. Each local congregation is self-governing under Christ. Baptism and the Lord's Supper are ordinances of obedience rather than means by which grace is given. Religious liberty
- the freedom of every soul before God - is a Christian principle.
Where it came from
Zwingli and the Supper
Huldrych Zwingli became people's priest at the Grossmünster in Zürich in 1519 and led the city's reformation with the city council's support. Around 1524 he read a letter by Cornelius Hoen, a Dutch lawyer, arguing that in "this is my body" the word is should be read as signifies. Zwingli adopted the reading. At Easter 1525 Zürich abolished the Mass and replaced it with a simple memorial service, held four times a year, at which the bread and cup were carried to the people seated in their places.
Zwingli argued that Christ's body, having ascended, is in heaven and cannot be in many places at once; that "the flesh profiteth nothing" (John 6:63); and that faith feeds on Christ spiritually by remembering and trusting, not by eating. He described the Supper as a thanksgiving and a public pledge of the believer's membership in the church - the word sacramentum in its old sense of a soldier's oath.
Marburg, October 1529
Philip of Hesse wanted a Protestant political alliance and could not have one while Wittenberg and Zürich were condemning each other. He brought Luther and Melanchthon to his castle at Marburg to meet Zwingli, Oecolampadius and Bucer from 1 to 4 October 1529.
They agreed on fourteen articles - the Trinity, the person of Christ, justification, baptism (including infant baptism) and more - and on most of the fifteenth. They could not agree "whether the true body and blood of Christ are bodily present in the bread and wine". At the start of the debate Luther wrote Hoc est corpus meum in chalk on the table under the cloth, and when Zwingli pressed his arguments, Luther lifted the cloth. At the end, when Bucer asked to be recognised as a brother, Luther is reported to have replied that they had "a different spirit".†
Zwingli was killed two years later at the battle of Kappel (11 October 1531), where he went out with the Zürich forces against the Catholic cantons. His body was quartered and burned by the victors.
Pause and thinkPause: Luther and Zwingli agreed on fourteen and a half articles out of fifteen. Why would Luther refuse fellowship over the one half-article left?
Because for Luther the question was not a fine point of theory but whether Christ's words mean what they say, and whether Christ gives Himself to His people or only reminds them of Himself.
If "this is my body" may be read as "this signifies my body", then the plain word of Christ can be bent by reason whenever it seems impossible - and Luther saw that the same method could dissolve the Incarnation, the resurrection, and baptismal regeneration. He also saw a different understanding of how God deals with us: either God comes to us in outward, physical means, as He did in the flesh of Christ, or He deals with us only "spiritually", inwardly, through our own remembering. That was the same line he had already drawn against Karlstadt and the Zwickau Prophets. For Luther, Zwingli's Supper belonged with the enthusiasts.
Calvin's correction
It is important to be fair to the Reformed tradition here. John Calvin, the greatest Reformed theologian, explicitly rejected Zwingli's bare memorialism as "profane". He taught that in the Supper believers truly receive the body and blood of Christ - not in the bread, but by the power of the Spirit lifting them to Christ in heaven. He wanted the Supper every Sunday, and the Geneva council refused him. The Heidelberg Catechism (1563), the Belgic Confession (1561) and the Westminster Confession (1647) all teach that worthy receivers "spiritually receive and feed upon Christ crucified".
So the memorial view of most modern evangelical churches is not the Reformed view. It is Zwingli's view, and it came into the free churches chiefly through the Baptists and the revivalists.
The regulative principle and the Puritans
Zwingli removed organs, images and vestments from Zürich's churches on the principle that Scripture forbids in worship what it does not command. Calvin held a gentler form of the same principle. In the Church of England it became the programme of the Puritans - those who wanted the Elizabethan church "purified" of everything that remained from Rome.
The Puritans objected to the surplice, kneeling at communion, the ring in marriage, the sign of the cross in baptism, bishops, set prayers, saints' days and the Prayer Book itself. After the Civil War, Parliament abolished the Prayer Book (1645), replaced it with the Directory for the Public Worship of God, and in 1647 abolished the observance of Christmas, Easter and Whitsun. The Westminster Confession (1647) gives the classic definition: God "may not be worshipped according to the imaginations and devices of men... or any other way not prescribed in the holy Scripture" (21.1).
The four traditions take the opposite view, sometimes called the normative principle: the Church may order her worship as she judges edifying, provided nothing contradicts Scripture.
John Smyth, Thomas Helwys and the first Baptists
Some Puritans gave up on the Church of England altogether. These Separatists held that a true church is a voluntary covenant of visible saints, and that a national church containing everyone could not be one.
John Smyth was a Cambridge-educated clergyman of the Church of England, ordained in 1594, and for a time city lecturer at Lincoln. By 1606-07 he had become pastor of a Separatist congregation at Gainsborough, and in 1608 he led it to Amsterdam to escape prosecution. There he concluded that the Church of England's baptism was as false as its ministry, and that infant baptism was "the mark of the beast". In 1609, with no one he considered validly baptised to baptise him, he baptised himself and then the rest of his congregation, including Thomas Helwys. He set out his reasoning in The Character of the Beast (1609).
Within months Smyth began to doubt that he had the right to do this, and sought admission to the Waterlander Mennonites, who had an unbroken succession of believer's baptism. Helwys refused to follow, and the congregation split. Smyth died of tuberculosis in Amsterdam in 1612 before his admission was completed.
In 1612 Helwys led his group back to London and founded a church at Spitalfields - the first Baptist church on English soil. The same year he published A Short Declaration of the Mystery of Iniquity, which includes one of the earliest pleas in English for universal liberty of conscience. He sent a signed copy to James I with the inscription that "the King is a mortal man and not God, therefore hath no power over the immortal souls of his subjects". He was imprisoned in Newgate and had died by about 1616.
These were the General Baptists, Arminian in theology. A separate group of Particular (Calvinist) Baptists emerged in London in the 1630s, adopted baptism by immersion around 1641, and published the London Confession in 1644. American Baptist life grew from both, beginning with Roger Williams at Providence in 1638-39 - who, like Smyth, soon doubted his own baptism and left the church he founded.
What the historic Church taught
On the Eucharist, the testimony of the early Church is consistent and strong.
- Ignatius of Antioch (c. 107), describing heretics: "They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they confess not the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins" (Smyrnaeans 7).
- Justin Martyr (c. 155): "Not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but... the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word... is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh" (First Apology 66).
- Irenaeus (c. 180) argues for the resurrection of the body from the fact that our bodies are nourished by the body and blood of the Lord (Against Heresies 5.2.3).
- Cyril of Jerusalem (c. 350): "Consider therefore the bread and wine not as bare elements, for they are, according to the Lord's declaration, the body and blood of Christ" (Mystagogical Catecheses 4.6).
Paul writes that the cup of blessing "is the communion of the blood of Christ" and that whoever eats unworthily is "guilty of the body and blood of the Lord" (1 Corinthians 10:16; 11:27). Christ says, "Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you" (John 6:53).
On worship, the Church inherited from the synagogue and the Temple a pattern of set prayer, psalmody, readings and offering, and from the apostles the Eucharist on the Lord's Day. Justin's description of Sunday worship in about 155 - readings from the apostles and prophets, a sermon, common prayers, the kiss of peace, the Eucharistic prayer and communion - is recognisably the shape of the liturgy still used by all four traditions.
On baptism, see the Radical Reformation.
The verdict
The memorial-only Supper is a sixteenth-century innovation. No Father of the Church teaches it; the earliest writers call the Eucharist the flesh and blood of Christ. It was rejected by Luther, by Calvin, by the Council of Trent, by the Church of England's Articles and by the Orthodox synods. It entered modern evangelicalism through Zwingli, the Baptists and the revivalists, not through the early Church.
The regulative principle, applied strictly, removes from worship what the Church has always done - set prayers, the church year, the liturgy itself - on the ground that the New Testament does not prescribe them in detail. But the New Testament does not prescribe most things in detail, including how often to meet, what order of service to follow, or which songs to sing. The principle has never produced agreement even among those who hold it.
Baptist churches combine the Anabaptist doctrine of baptism with the English Separatist doctrine of the gathered church. Their witness to liberty of conscience was courageous and in advance of its age, and should be honoured. But a church that begins with a man baptising himself, because no church on earth was good enough to baptise him, is the clearest possible example of the restorationist thread that runs through this whole section.
How the four traditionsthe Catholic Churchthe Orthodox Churchthe Lutheran Churchthe Anglican Communion responded
Lutheran
Lutherans count the Supper controversy as the defining break with the Reformed. The Augsburg Confession, Article X, states the position in one sentence: "Of the Supper of the Lord they teach that the Body and Blood of Christ are truly present, and are distributed to those who eat the Supper of the Lord; and they reject those that teach otherwise."
Luther's Confession Concerning Christ's Supper (1528) is his fullest answer to Zwingli; he wrote it as a last testament, so that no one could claim after his death that he had changed his mind. The Small Catechism gives every Lutheran child the answer: the Sacrament of the Altar "is the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, under the bread and wine, for us Christians to eat and to drink, instituted by Christ Himself".
The Formula of Concord (Article VII) rejects both the crude memorial view and the subtler Calvinist view that Christ's body is received only by the soul lifted to heaven, and teaches that even the unworthy receive Christ's body and blood, to their judgement (1 Corinthians 11:29).
On worship, Lutherans hold the normative principle: Augsburg Confession XV keeps "those rites... which may be observed without sin, and which are profitable unto tranquillity and good order in the Church". Lutheran churches kept the Mass, the church year, vestments, crucifixes and the organ, and Lutheran music from Bach onward is the fruit.
Catholic
The Council of Trent answered Zwingli directly in its decree on the Eucharist (Session XIII, 1551). Canon 1 anathematises anyone who denies that in the Eucharist "are contained truly, really, and substantially, the body and blood together with the soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, and consequently the whole Christ; but says that He is only therein as in a sign, or in figure, or virtue". Session XXII (1562) teaches that the Mass is a true propitiatory sacrifice, the one sacrifice of Calvary made present.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church (1374) states that Christ's presence in the Eucharist is "presence in the fullest sense: that is to say, it is a substantial presence by which Christ, God and man, makes himself wholly and entirely present".
On worship, the Catholic Church holds that the Church has authority to order the liturgy, and that the liturgy itself is a source and witness of the faith - lex orandi, lex credendi, the law of prayer is the law of belief.
Orthodox
The Orthodox Church faced Reformed theology in its own house. In 1629 Cyril Lucaris, Patriarch of Constantinople, published in Geneva a confession of faith with strongly Calvinist teaching on predestination, Scripture and the Eucharist. After his death in 1638, Orthodox synods repudiated it - at Constantinople (1638), Iasi (1642), and above all at Jerusalem in 1672.
The Confession of Dositheus, adopted at Jerusalem, teaches in Decree 17 that in the Divine Liturgy "the Lord Jesus Christ is present, not typically, nor figuratively... but truly and really, so that after the consecration of the bread and of the wine, the bread is transmuted, transubstantiated, converted and transformed into the true Body itself of the Lord". It rejects every teaching that the Eucharist is only a sign.
On worship, the Orthodox Church regards the Divine Liturgy as received, not invented: the Liturgies of St John Chrysostom and St Basil are served essentially as they have been for over a thousand years. A principle that would strip worship to what the New Testament explicitly commands is, to Orthodox eyes, a principle that would strip away the Church's memory.
Anglican
The Thirty-Nine Articles answer Zwingli's view and the Baptist "ordinance" in two articles. Article XXV: "Sacraments ordained of Christ be not only badges or tokens of Christian men's profession, but rather they be certain sure witnesses, and effectual signs of grace." Article XXVIII: "The Supper of the Lord is not only a sign of the love that Christians ought to have among themselves one to another; but rather is a Sacrament of our Redemption by Christ's death: insomuch that to such as rightly, worthily, and with faith, receive the same, the Bread which we break is a partaking of the Body of Christ."
Against the Puritans' regulative principle, Article XX affirms that "the Church hath power to decree Rites or Ceremonies", provided nothing is ordained contrary to Scripture, and Article XXXIV that traditions and ceremonies may differ in different places. Richard Hooker's Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity (from 1594) is the great Anglican answer to the Puritans: Scripture is not a rulebook for every detail of worship, and the Church may use reason and tradition to order what Scripture leaves open.
John Smyth was ordained in the Church of England and left it. The Baptist movement is, in that sense, an Anglican family quarrel that became a separate church.
Key personalities
Huldrych Zwingli1484–1531Full profile · 7 min Reformer of Zürich whose memorial view of the Lord's Supper divided Protestantism at Marburg in 1529
- Affiliation
- Catholic priest; people's priest at the Grossmünster, Zürich, from 1519; leader of the Swiss Reformation
- Appears in
- Zwingli, the Puritans and the first Baptists, The Radical Reformation
- Profile
- Link to this profile
Life
Toggenburg, Basel and Vienna
Huldrych Zwingli was born on 1 January 1484 at Wildhaus in the Toggenburg valley, in the eastern Swiss Confederation, the son of a prosperous farmer and local magistrate. His uncle, a priest, took charge of his education. He studied at Vienna and Basel, where he took his master's degree in 1506 and absorbed the humanism of the age, and was ordained priest that year.
Glarus and Einsiedeln
From 1506 to 1516 he was parish priest at Glarus. He taught himself Greek, read the Church Fathers and corresponded with Erasmus, whom he met in 1516 and revered. Twice he went with the Glarus troops as chaplain to Italy, where Swiss mercenaries fought for the Pope, and the slaughter at Marignano in 1515 turned him into an opponent of the mercenary trade. From 1516 he was priest at the pilgrimage shrine of Einsiedeln, where he preached against the abuse of pilgrimages and indulgences, though he had not yet broken with the Church's doctrine. He later admitted to a sexual lapse during his years at Glarus and Einsiedeln, which nearly cost him his appointment at Zürich.
Zürich
On 1 January 1519, his thirty-fifth birthday, he became people's priest at the Grossmünster in Zürich. He announced that instead of following the lectionary he would preach through the Gospel of Matthew from beginning to end - the lectio continua that became a mark of the Reformed tradition. Later that year he nearly died of the plague, which deepened his sense of dependence on God's providence.
The break with Rome
In Lent 1522 a group of his friends, meeting at the house of the printer Christoph Froschauer, ate sausages in defiance of the fast; Zwingli, who was present but did not eat, defended them in a sermon, On the Choice and Freedom of Foods. That year he also married Anna Reinhart, a widow, in secret, making the marriage public in 1524. In January 1523 the city council held a public disputation at which Zwingli defended his Sixty-seven Articles, and the council resolved that he should continue to preach from Scripture. A second disputation in October 1523 debated images and the Mass. Images were removed from the churches in 1524, and at Easter 1525 the Mass was abolished and replaced by a simple communion service, with bread and wine on wooden plates carried to the people in their pews.
The radicals
Among Zwingli's most ardent early followers were young men, including Conrad Grebel and Felix Manz, who wanted him to move faster and to abolish the Mass without waiting for the council. When at the second disputation he deferred to the council's timetable, they broke with him. They came to reject infant baptism, and in January 1525 began baptising adults. Zwingli opposed them in writing, and the council imprisoned and banished them; in March 1526 it decreed death for rebaptism, and Manz was drowned in the Limmat in January 1527. Zwingli supported the council's measures.
Marburg
Zwingli's view of the Lord's Supper as a memorial brought him into conflict with Luther. After years of pamphlet warfare, Philip of Hesse brought the two together at Marburg in October 1529, hoping to unite the Protestants politically. They agreed on fourteen of fifteen articles but not on the presence of Christ's body and blood in the Supper. Luther chalked "Hoc est corpus meum" on the table, and at the end refused Zwingli's hand of fellowship as a brother.
Kappel
Zwingli worked for an alliance of the Reformed cities and pressed Zürich to use force to open the Catholic cantons to evangelical preaching. A first war at Kappel in 1529 ended without battle. In 1531 Zürich imposed a food blockade on the inner cantons, which responded by attacking. On 11 October 1531 the Zürich forces were defeated at Kappel, and Zwingli, who had gone out as chaplain and armed, was killed on the field.
Key dates
- 1 January 1484 - Born at Wildhaus
- 1506 - Ordained; parish priest at Glarus
- 1515 - Chaplain at Marignano
- 1516 - Priest at Einsiedeln; meets Erasmus
- 1 January 1519 - People's priest at the Grossmünster, Zürich
- Lent 1522 - The affair of the sausages
- January 1523 - First Zürich disputation; the Sixty-seven Articles
- October 1523 - Second disputation
- 1524 - Images removed; marriage to Anna Reinhart made public
- Easter 1525 - Mass abolished in Zürich
- 1525 - Commentary on True and False Religion
- 1527 - Felix Manz drowned
- October 1529 - Marburg Colloquy
- 1531 - Zürich Bible (Froschauer) completed
- 11 October 1531 - Killed at Kappel
Teachings and claims
Scripture alone
Zwingli taught that Scripture is clear and sufficient, and that whatever is not commanded in it is to be removed from the Church's worship. He applied this more strictly than Luther, who retained what Scripture did not forbid.
The Lord's Supper
He taught that in "This is my body" the word "is" means "signifies", that Christ's human body, ascended into heaven, is at the right hand of God and cannot be present in many places, and that "the flesh profiteth nothing" (John 6:63). The Supper is a memorial of Christ's death, a thanksgiving (eucharist) and a public pledge by which believers declare their faith and their membership of the body. In his later writings he spoke of Christ being present to the contemplation of faith.
Baptism
Against the Anabaptists he defended infant baptism as a covenant sign, the successor to circumcision, by which children of believers are marked as belonging to God's people. He did not, however, hold that baptism conveys grace.
Providence and election
He taught a strong doctrine of providence and of God's free election, and held that God might elect even virtuous pagans; he expected to see Socrates and other ancients in heaven.
Church and state
He saw the Christian city as one community, in which the magistrate, guided by the preacher, orders the outward life of the Church.
Christology
To defend his eucharistic teaching, he used a figure of speech he called alloeosis, by which what Scripture says of one of Christ's natures is attributed to the other. Luther believed this divided the person of Christ.
Documented controversies
The Anabaptists
He supported the persecution of his former followers, including the death penalty for rebaptism. Mennonite and Baptist historians, and many Reformed scholars today, regard this as a grave wrong.
Marburg
His disagreement with Luther divided Protestantism permanently. Luther believed his teaching on the Supper and on Christ's person to be a different spirit; Zwingli regarded Luther's view as a remnant of the papacy.
War
His advocacy of armed force against the Catholic cantons, and his death on the battlefield, were criticised by Luther and others as the fruit of mixing the gospel with the sword.
Death
He was killed at the battle of Kappel on 11 October 1531, aged 47. The victorious Catholic troops found his body on the field, tried it as a heretic and traitor, quartered it and burned it with dung, so that no relics would remain.
Legacy
Zwingli is the founder of the Reformed tradition, though its classic form was given by Heinrich Bullinger, his successor at Zürich, and by John Calvin, who modified his eucharistic teaching to affirm a true, spiritual feeding on Christ. The Consensus Tigurinus of 1549 united the Zürich and Genevan churches. His memorial view survived among the Anabaptists' successors, the Baptists and the free churches, and is now the common view of most evangelical and non-denominational churches. His lectio continua, his simplified worship and his ideal of a reformed Christian commonwealth shaped Reformed Protestantism for centuries.
Measured against the creeds
Zwingli confessed the creeds and the doctrines of the Trinity and the two natures of Christ, and his preaching recovered the reading of Scripture in the language of the people.
His teaching on the Supper, however, departs from what the Church had confessed since the Fathers. Ignatius of Antioch called the Eucharist "the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ"; Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Cyril of Jerusalem and Augustine all confessed that the bread and cup are Christ's body and blood. The Catholic, Orthodox and Lutheran churches hold to the real presence, and the Anglican Articles reject a "bare figure" (Article 28 speaks of partaking of the body of Christ). Luther's response, in Confession Concerning Christ's Supper (1528) and the Formula of Concord (Article 7), was that Zwingli's argument from the location of Christ's body divided His person and made human reason the judge of His words. The Formula of Concord rejects the teaching that the words of institution are to be taken figuratively.
On baptism, he defended the practice of the Church but emptied it of its gift; the historic churches confess "one baptism for the remission of sins". And in the persecution of the Anabaptists, the Reformed churches, like the Lutheran and Catholic, share a guilt that their modern heirs have acknowledged.
Major writings
- Sixty-seven Articles (1523)
- Commentary on True and False Religion (1525)
- On Baptism, Rebaptism and Infant Baptism (1525)
- On the Lord's Supper (1526)
- Friendly Exegesis (1527)
- Fidei Ratio (1530)
- An Exposition of the Faith (1531)
Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt1486–1541Full profile · 6 min Luther's colleague who moved from liturgical reform to rejecting the real presence and infant baptism, prompting "Against the Heavenly Prophets"
- Affiliation
- Professor at Wittenberg and Luther's senior colleague; later a Reformed theologian at Basel
- Appears in
- The Radical Reformation, Zwingli, the Puritans and the first Baptists
- Profile
- Link to this profile
Life
The Wittenberg professor
Andreas Rudolff-Bodenstein was born in 1486 in the town of Karlstadt am Main in Franconia, from which he took his name. He studied at Erfurt and Cologne and in 1505 went to the new University of Wittenberg, where he became a doctor of theology in 1510, archdeacon of the Castle Church and a leading member of the faculty. A scholastic theologian of the Thomist school, he was Luther's senior colleague; in October 1512 he presided over the ceremony at which Luther received his doctorate. In 1515-16 he studied law in Rome.
Converted to Augustine
In 1517, after reading Augustine, he turned against scholastic theology, and in April of that year, months before Luther's Ninety-five Theses, he posted 151 theses on grace and the will. He became one of Luther's most energetic allies. At the Leipzig Disputation of 1519 he debated Johann Eck for a week before Luther took his place, and in 1520 the papal bull threatening Luther with excommunication named him also.
The Wittenberg movement
While Luther was hidden at the Wartburg in 1521-22, Karlstadt led the reform in Wittenberg. On Christmas Day 1521 he celebrated the first evangelical communion, without vestments, in German, omitting the sacrificial prayers and giving the cup to the laity. In January 1522 he married Anna von Mochau, a girl of fifteen; the city council adopted an ordinance abolishing private Masses and removing images, and in the following weeks images were destroyed in the churches. The disorder alarmed the Elector, and in March 1522 Luther returned and, in his eight Invocavit sermons, reversed much of what had been done, insisting that changes must be made in love and with regard for the weak.
Orlamünde
Karlstadt withdrew from academic life. He renounced his doctorate, dressed as a peasant and asked to be called "Brother Andrew". In 1523 he took the parish of Orlamünde, which was attached to his archdeaconry, and there carried out his reforms: images removed, infant baptism dropped, the Supper as a memorial. In August 1524 Luther, on a visitation tour, met him at the Black Bear inn at Jena; after a heated exchange Luther gave him a gold gulden as a pledge that he should write against him openly. Shortly afterwards the Elector expelled Karlstadt from Saxony.
Exile
He travelled to Strasbourg, Basel and Zürich, publishing tracts against the real presence which Luther answered in Against the Heavenly Prophets (1524-25). During the Peasants' War of 1525 he was at Rothenburg ob der Tauber, where he was suspected of sympathy with the rebels. Destitute and in danger, he wrote to Luther, who sheltered him secretly in his own house in Wittenberg in June 1525 on condition that he submit his writings for approval. He lived for some years as a farmer and shopkeeper near Wittenberg, under restrictions, but in 1529 he fled again.
Basel
After time in Holstein and East Frisia, where he took part in the sacramental controversies, he went to Zürich in 1530, where Zwingli found him work, and in 1534 became preacher at St Peter's in Basel and professor at the university, where he spent his last years in comparative peace.
Key dates
- 1486 - Born at Karlstadt am Main
- 1510 - Doctor of theology at Wittenberg
- October 1512 - Presides at Luther's doctoral promotion
- April 1517 - Posts 151 theses on grace
- 1519 - Leipzig Disputation with Eck
- Christmas Day 1521 - First evangelical communion in Wittenberg
- January 1522 - Marries; the Wittenberg ordinance
- March 1522 - Luther returns and reverses the reforms
- 1523 - Pastor at Orlamünde
- August 1524 - Meeting with Luther at Jena
- September 1524 - Expelled from Saxony
- 1524-25 - Luther's Against the Heavenly Prophets
- June 1525 - Sheltered in Luther's house
- 1529 - Flees Saxony
- 1534 - Preacher and professor at Basel
- 24 December 1541 - Dies of plague at Basel
Teachings and claims
Images
Karlstadt taught that images in churches are forbidden by the first commandment and must be removed, and that the magistrate and the congregation have a duty to remove them without waiting for the weak.
The Supper
He came to deny that Christ's body and blood are present in the sacrament. In "This is my body", he argued, Christ pointed to His own body, not to the bread (the Greek touto, "this", being neuter while artos, "bread", is masculine). The Supper is a remembrance of Christ's death, and its benefit lies in the believer's ardent remembrance of it.
Baptism
He held that baptism without faith is of no value and gave up the baptism of infants at Orlamünde, though he did not practise rebaptism.
Lay religion and mysticism
Influenced by German mysticism, he taught that true religion is the inward "abandonment" (Gelassenheit) of the soul to God, and he valued the lay Christian and the peasant above the learned doctor.
Documented controversies
Wittenberg 1522
His reforms, made in Luther's absence and accompanied by iconoclasm, caused disturbances which Luther and the Elector regarded as dangerous. Luther's Invocavit sermons established the principle of reform through preaching and patience.
Against the Heavenly Prophets
Luther's long reply, written in 1524-25, accused Karlstadt of making outward law of what should be freedom, of confusing the inward and outward word, and of reading his own reason into Christ's words. Luther grouped him with Müntzer and the "fanatics", which Karlstadt resented, since he rejected violence.
The Peasants' War
His presence at Rothenburg during the revolt led to suspicion that he supported it; he denied this and wrote an apology.
Death
He died of plague at Basel on 24 December 1541, aged about 55.†
Legacy
Karlstadt has been called the first Puritan. His insistence that worship must be restricted to what Scripture commands, his iconoclasm and his symbolic view of the Supper anticipated, and in part influenced, Zwingli and the Reformed tradition. Some historians also regard him as a forerunner of the Anabaptists and of later lay and spiritualist movements. His conflict with Luther shaped the Lutheran Reformation's conservative attitude to liturgy and images.
Measured against the creeds
Karlstadt's early recovery of Augustine on grace stood within the catholic faith, and his concern for the participation of the laity and the reform of abuses was shared by Luther.
His later teaching, however, departs from the historic faith. On the Supper, he denied what the Church had confessed since the Fathers - that the bread and cup are the body and blood of Christ - and his grammatical argument from touto was rejected even by Zwingli. The Formula of Concord (Article 7) rejects his interpretation by name among the figurative readings. On images, the Seventh Ecumenical Council (Nicaea II, 787) defended the veneration of images as an expression of the Incarnation, and while the Lutheran and Anglican churches did not follow Nicaea II in every respect, Luther insisted that images were not forbidden and that their removal by force was a new law imposed on consciences.
Luther's central objection remains the most searching: that Karlstadt replaced the outward word and sacrament, through which God gives the Spirit, with an inward spirituality that made the Christian's own experience the measure of the gospel. "God will not give you his Spirit without the external word," Luther wrote, "but through it."
Major writings
- 151 Theses (1517)
- On the Removal of Images (1522)
- Whether One Should Proceed Slowly (1524)
- Dialogue on the Abominable and Idolatrous Misuse of the Most Worthy Sacrament (1524)
- Apology (1525)
Conrad Grebelc. 1498–1526Full profile · 6 min Performed the first rebaptism in Zürich on 21 January 1525 - the beginning of believer's baptism as the practice of a church
- Affiliation
- Zürich patrician and humanist; disciple of Zwingli; founder of the Swiss Brethren
- Appears in
- The Radical Reformation, Zwingli, the Puritans and the first Baptists
- Profile
- Link to this profile
Life
A patrician son
Conrad Grebel was born around 1498, probably at Grüningen near Zürich, into one of the leading families of the city. His father, Jakob Grebel, was an iron merchant, magistrate and member of the Zürich council. Conrad was educated at the Latin school of the Grossmünster and then at the universities of Basel (1514), Vienna (1515-18), where he studied under the humanist Joachim Vadian, and Paris (1518-20), on scholarships from the Emperor and the King of France. His student years were turbulent: he quarrelled with his father over money, and his letters speak of brawling and dissipation. He returned to Zürich in 1520 without a degree. Vadian married his sister Martha.
Zwingli's disciple
In Zürich Grebel joined a circle of young humanists who studied Greek, Hebrew and the Scriptures with Huldrych Zwingli. In 1522 he married Barbara, a young woman of lower rank, against his parents' wishes. About the same time he experienced a religious conversion and became one of Zwingli's most zealous supporters, and his letters to Vadian show his growing conviction that the Church must be restored to the New Testament pattern.
The break
At the second Zürich disputation in October 1523, Zwingli agreed that the Mass was unscriptural but left the timing of its abolition to the city council. Grebel and his friends, among them Felix Manz and Simon Stumpf, objected that the council had no authority over the word of God. From that point they began to meet separately for Bible study. Over the following year they concluded that infant baptism had no warrant in Scripture and that the true Church was a gathered community of committed believers, separate from the state.
The letter to Müntzer
In September 1524 Grebel wrote, for the group, a long letter to Thomas Müntzer, whose writings they had read. They praised his opposition to infant baptism but urged him to abandon liturgical chant and German Masses for the simple Supper of believers, and to renounce the sword: "true believing Christians are sheep among wolves". The letter was probably never delivered, but it is the earliest statement of the Swiss Brethren's views.
The first baptisms
In January 1525 the council held a disputation on baptism, ruled against the radicals, ordered all unbaptised infants to be baptised within eight days and forbade the group to meet. On the evening of 21 January 1525, in the house of Felix Manz's mother in Zürich, the group prayed, and George Blaurock, a former priest, asked Grebel to baptise him. Grebel did so, and Blaurock then baptised the others present. A few days later a congregation of believers was formed at the village of Zollikon. This is usually regarded as the beginning of the Anabaptist movement.
Mission and prison
Grebel preached in Schaffhausen, St Gallen (where hundreds were baptised in the river Sitter in April 1525) and the Grüningen district. He was arrested in October 1525, tried with Manz and Blaurock in March 1526 and sentenced to life imprisonment. Within two weeks the prisoners escaped. The same month the council decreed death by drowning for anyone who rebaptised. Grebel's father was executed in October 1526 for having received foreign pensions, a charge some historians connect with the pressures of the family's position.†
Key dates
- c. 1498 - Born near Zürich
- 1514-20 - Studies at Basel, Vienna and Paris
- 1522 - Marries; joins Zwingli's circle; conversion
- October 1523 - Second disputation; the break with Zwingli
- 5 September 1524 - Letter to Thomas Müntzer
- 17 January 1525 - Disputation on baptism; radicals ordered to desist
- 21 January 1525 - First believer's baptism in Zürich
- April 1525 - Mass baptisms at St Gallen
- October 1525 - Arrested
- March 1526 - Sentenced to life imprisonment; escapes
- Summer 1526 - Dies of plague at Maienfeld
Teachings and claims
The gathered church
Grebel taught that the Church consists only of those who have repented, believed and committed themselves to follow Christ, and that it must be separate from the civic community. Membership is voluntary and marked by baptism.
Believer's baptism
He held that baptism must follow faith and the person's own request, since the New Testament records no infant baptisms and since infants cannot repent or confess. He regarded infant baptism as the "greatest and first abomination of the pope".
The Supper
He taught that the Supper is a memorial meal of the gathered church, to be eaten with ordinary bread, without vestments or chant, and only by those living in brotherly love.
Non-resistance and discipline
He held that Christians must not use the sword, either in war or as magistrates, and that the church must exercise discipline by the "ban" of Matthew 18.
Documented controversies
Breaking from the Reformation
His insistence that the Church's reform be carried out without regard to the city council was regarded by Zwingli as sedition and by the council as rebellion. To the Reformers, the Anabaptists threatened the unity of Christian society.
Rebaptism
The act of 21 January 1525 was, in the eyes of every established church, a repetition of a sacrament already validly given, and in imperial law a capital crime. The Anabaptists held that infant baptism was no baptism, so that theirs was the first true one.
Persecution
Grebel was imprisoned for his faith, and his friends were executed: Manz was drowned in the Limmat in January 1527 and Blaurock burned in the Tyrol in 1529.
Death
He died of plague at Maienfeld in the Grisons in the summer of 1526, aged about twenty-eight, perhaps eighteen months after the first baptisms.†
Legacy
Mennonites, Amish and many Baptists regard Grebel as a founder of their tradition, and the Swiss Brethren, who produced the Schleitheim Confession in 1527, continued his teaching. The Mennonite college Conrad Grebel University College in Ontario bears his name. Historians honour him as the first to put into practice the idea of a free church of believers separate from the state.
Measured against the creeds
Grebel confessed the faith of the Apostles' and Nicene Creeds, and his longing for a Church of holy lives, his refusal of violence and his courage under persecution deserve respect. The persecution he and his friends suffered at the hands of the Reformed authorities was a wrong that the Reformed churches have since acknowledged; the Lutheran World Federation also asked Mennonites' forgiveness in 2010 for the persecution of Anabaptists by Lutherans.
But his doctrine of baptism departs from what the Church had received. The creed confesses "one baptism for the remission of sins"; the Church from the second century baptised infants (Irenaeus, Hippolytus, Origen, Cyprian), and the household baptisms of Acts (16:15, 33; 1 Corinthians 1:16) and the promise "to you and to your children" (Acts 2:39) were read in that light. To baptise those already baptised in the triune name treats Christ's baptism as no baptism, which the Church had rejected in the Donatist controversy. Luther's Concerning Rebaptism (1528) argued that baptism rests on God's word and command, not on the faith of the one baptised, and that the Anabaptists made their own faith the foundation of the sacrament.
His idea of the Church as a gathered community of the visibly holy also differs from the creeds' "holy catholic Church", which the Fathers and Reformers alike understood as a mixed body in which wheat and tares grow together until the harvest (Matthew 13:24-30).
Major writings
- Letter to Thomas Müntzer (5 September 1524)
- Letters to Joachim Vadian (1517-25)
- Protestation and Defence (1524-25)
John Smythc. 1570–1612Full profile · 5 min Baptised himself and his congregation in 1609 because he believed no church on earth had a true baptism - the beginning of the Baptist churches
- Affiliation
- Church of England clergyman (ordained 1594); Separatist pastor at Gainsborough; founder of the first English Baptist congregation, in Amsterdam
- Appears in
- Zwingli, the Puritans and the first Baptists
- Profile
- Link to this profile
Life
Cambridge and the Puritan pulpit
John Smyth was probably born around 1570 in Nottinghamshire or Lincolnshire; the details are uncertain. He studied at Christ's College, Cambridge, then a centre of Puritan teaching, where his tutor was the Separatist-leaning Francis Johnson. He took his BA in 1590 and MA in 1593, became a fellow of the college, and was ordained in the Church of England in 1594.
In 1600 he was elected city lecturer (preacher) at Lincoln. His sermons attacked the city's leading men, and in 1602 he was dismissed for "personal preaching" - naming and criticising individuals from the pulpit. He published sermons on the Lord's Prayer (A Paterne of True Prayer, 1605) that were still conventionally Puritan and even defended set forms of prayer.
Separation
Over the next few years, under pressure from the bishops' drive for conformity after 1604, Smyth concluded that the Church of England was not a true church at all. Around 1606-07 he became pastor of a Separatist congregation at Gainsborough in Lincolnshire; a sister congregation met at Scrooby, among them William Brewster and William Bradford, later of the Mayflower. Facing arrest, both groups moved to Amsterdam in 1607-08.
Amsterdam and the self-baptism
In Amsterdam Smyth's congregation lived beside the "Ancient Church" of English exiles led by his old tutor Francis Johnson. Smyth's views moved quickly. In The Differences of the Churches of the Separation (1608) he argued that during worship no translation of Scripture should be read and no book used at all, since spiritual worship must come from the heart; the original-language text could be read before worship and translated aloud.
By late 1608 or early 1609 he had concluded that infant baptism was invalid and that the Separatists, having rejected the Church of England as false, could not keep the baptism it had given them. Since he knew of no true church anywhere from which to receive a valid baptism, he baptised himself - probably by pouring, not immersion - and then Thomas Helwys and the rest of the congregation. He defended this in The Character of the Beast (1609).
Second thoughts
Within months, Smyth met the Waterlander Mennonites in Amsterdam and concluded that they were a true church after all, with a succession of baptism. He had therefore been wrong to baptise himself, and he and most of his congregation applied to join them. Helwys and a minority refused, excommunicated Smyth, and returned to England in 1612 to found the first Baptist church on English soil. Smyth's last writings are gentle and self-reproaching; he regretted the harshness of his earlier polemics and wrote that he would no longer quarrel over outward forms.
Key dates
- c. 1570 - Born, probably in the East Midlands
- 1590-93 - BA and MA, Christ's College, Cambridge
- 1594 - Ordained in the Church of England
- 1600-02 - City lecturer at Lincoln; dismissed
- c. 1606-07 - Pastor of the Separatist church at Gainsborough
- 1608 - Moves to Amsterdam; The Differences of the Churches of the Separation
- 1609 - Baptises himself and his congregation; The Character of the Beast
- 1610 - Seeks admission to the Waterlander Mennonites; excommunicated by Helwys's group
- August 1612 - Dies in Amsterdam
- 1615 - His followers are received into the Mennonite church
Teachings and claims
The gathered church
Smyth taught that a true church is formed when believers covenant together to walk in God's ways. Membership is by profession of faith, not by birth in a parish. The church elects its own officers, and no bishop or magistrate has authority over it.
Believer's baptism
He came to hold that baptism belongs only to those who repent and believe, and that infant baptism was "the mark of the beast" in Revelation - the sign of a false, national church. He saw the act of baptising himself as the restoration of a true church that had been lost.
Arminianism and freedom
Under Mennonite influence he abandoned Calvinist predestination, teaching that Christ died for all and that grace can be resisted. His final confession (1612) also argued that the magistrate has no authority over the conscience in religion, an idea Helwys developed into a plea for universal religious liberty.
Documented controversies
- The self-baptism. Contemporaries mocked him as the "Se-Baptist". Puritans and Separatists alike - among them Richard Clyfton, John Robinson and Richard Bernard - wrote against him.
- The turn to the Mennonites. Helwys's party regarded it as a denial of the very act that had founded their church and excommunicated him; the dispute was bitter on both sides.
- Worship without books. His refusal of translations and set forms during worship was rejected even by most Separatists.
Death
Smyth died of tuberculosis in Amsterdam in August 1612 and was buried on 1 September, before the Mennonites had completed his admission. His remaining followers were received in January 1615.
Legacy
Smyth is counted the founder of the General (Arminian) Baptists, through Helwys, and his congregation is often called the first Baptist church. Baptists today number some 100 million worldwide across many unions and conventions. His insistence on the gathered church of believers, believer's baptism and freedom of conscience became characteristic of much of English-speaking Protestantism.
His life is also a parable of the restorationist dilemma described in this section. Having concluded that the Church had lost true baptism, he could not restore it in a way that satisfied even himself, and spent his last months seeking a church with a continuous succession.
Measured against the creeds
The Nicene Creed confesses "one baptism for the remission of sins" and "one holy catholic and apostolic Church". Smyth's position required that for centuries there had been no true baptism and, in effect, no true Church - a view no ancient writer held. The early Church baptised infants; St Cyprian and a council at Carthage in 253 debated only whether to wait until the eighth day, and St Augustine treated infant baptism as the unquestioned tradition of the whole Church.
The Church has also always held that baptism is received, not self-administered: no one is the source of his own new birth. Smyth's own second thoughts - that he should have sought baptism from an existing church - came close to recognising this. His humility at the end, and his insistence that conscience cannot be forced by the state, deserve respect; his view of baptism and the Church remains the point of division.
Major writings
- A Paterne of True Prayer (1605)
- Principles and Inferences Concerning the Visible Church (1607)
- The Differences of the Churches of the Separation (1608)
- The Character of the Beast (1609)
- A Short Confession of Faith in Twenty Articles (1609-10)
- The Last Booke of John Smith, called the Retractation of his Errours (1612)
Thomas Helwysc. 1575–c. 1616Full profile · 5 min Founded the first Baptist church on English soil (1612) and wrote one of the earliest English pleas for universal liberty of conscience
- Affiliation
- Nottinghamshire gentleman and lawyer; member of Smyth's Separatist church; founder of the first Baptist church in England
- Appears in
- Zwingli, the Puritans and the first Baptists
- Profile
- Link to this profile
Life
A Nottinghamshire gentleman
Thomas Helwys was born around 1575, probably at Broxtowe Hall near Nottingham, into a family of minor gentry. He inherited Broxtowe Hall on his father's death. He studied law at Gray's Inn in London from 1593, and in 1595 married Joan Ashmore at Bilborough parish church; they had seven children. Broxtowe Hall became a meeting place for Puritans dissatisfied with the Church of England, and Helwys was drawn towards the Separatists, who held that the national church was so corrupt that true believers must leave it.
With John Smyth
By about 1606 Helwys had joined the Separatist congregation at Gainsborough in Lincolnshire led by John Smyth, a former Church of England clergyman. Under the pressure of persecution, the congregation emigrated to Amsterdam in 1608, and Helwys was a leading member and financial supporter of the move. His wife was arrested in England and imprisoned in York for refusing to take an oath; she was later released.
Baptism
In Amsterdam, Smyth concluded in 1609 that the church's baptism, received in the Church of England, was invalid, since that church was false, and that infant baptism was no baptism. He baptised himself, and then Helwys and the others. Shortly afterwards Smyth came to believe that he had acted wrongly by not seeking baptism from the Waterlander Mennonites, a true church already existing, and he and most of the congregation applied to join them. Helwys and a small group refused, holding that any company of believers could restore baptism and that seeking it from another church implied a succession that Scripture did not require. In 1610 they excommunicated Smyth's party.
Declaration and return
In 1611 Helwys's group issued A Declaration of Faith of English People Remaining at Amsterdam in Holland, in twenty-seven articles - the first Baptist confession in English. It affirmed general redemption (that Christ died for all) against Calvinist predestination, believer's baptism, the independence of the local church and the lawfulness of magistracy. Helwys became convinced that the English Separatists had been wrong to flee persecution, and in 1612 he and about ten others returned to England and founded a congregation at Spitalfields, outside the walls of London - the first Baptist church on English soil.
The Mystery of Iniquity
The same year he published A Short Declaration of the Mystery of Iniquity, which attacked the Church of England, the Puritans who remained within it, and the Separatists who had fled. Its final section argued that the king had no authority over the consciences of his subjects. On the flyleaf of a copy sent to James I he wrote: "The king is a mortal man and not God, therefore hath no power over the immortal souls of his subjects, to make laws and ordinances for them and to set spiritual lords over them." Helwys was arrested and imprisoned in Newgate, apparently for refusing the oath of allegiance.
Key dates
- c. 1575 - Born, probably at Broxtowe Hall, Nottinghamshire
- 1593 - Admitted to Gray's Inn
- 1595 - Marries Joan Ashmore
- c. 1606 - Joins John Smyth's Separatist congregation
- 1608 - Emigrates to Amsterdam
- 1609 - Baptised by Smyth
- 1610 - Separates from Smyth's party
- 1611 - A Declaration of Faith of English People Remaining at Amsterdam
- 1612 - Returns to England; founds the Spitalfields church; publishes The Mystery of Iniquity
- 1612-13 - Imprisoned in Newgate
- by 1616 - Dies in prison
Teachings and claims
Believer's baptism
Helwys taught that baptism belongs only to those who repent and believe, that infant baptism is invalid, and that a church may restore true baptism among its own members.
General redemption
He rejected Calvinist predestination, holding that Christ died for all and that the grace of God may be resisted. His congregation was the ancestor of the "General" (Arminian) Baptists, as distinct from the Particular (Calvinist) Baptists who emerged in the 1630s.
The local church
He taught that each congregation is a complete church under Christ, with power to choose its own officers and exercise its own discipline.
Liberty of conscience
Most remarkably, he argued that religion is a matter between God and the soul, that the state may punish crimes but not belief, and that this liberty belongs to all: "Let them be heretics, Turks, Jews, or whatsoever, it appertains not to the earthly power to punish them in the least measure."
Documented controversies
The break with Smyth
The quarrel over who could restore baptism divided a congregation of fewer than fifty people and left the two parties in mutual excommunication. Smyth's party eventually merged with the Mennonites.
Return to England
His decision to return, against the judgement of most Separatists, exposed his followers to persecution and led to his own imprisonment.
Polemics
The Mystery of Iniquity identified the Church of England with the second beast of Revelation, and condemned the Puritans and other Separatists in harsh terms.
Death
He died in Newgate prison. The date is not known, but a will of 1616 refers to him as dead.† His congregation continued under John Murton, who also wrote in defence of religious liberty.
Legacy
Baptists honour Helwys as the founder of their tradition in England, and Regent's Park College in Oxford holds a copy of The Mystery of Iniquity with his inscription to the king. Historians of religious liberty regard his plea, extending freedom of conscience to non-Christians, as the first of its kind in English, decades ahead of Roger Williams and John Locke. The General Baptists he founded became, in part, Unitarian in the eighteenth century, while the New Connexion of General Baptists (1770) returned to evangelical orthodoxy.
Measured against the creeds
Helwys confessed the Trinity and the creeds' doctrine of Christ, and his 1611 Declaration is orthodox on these points. His defence of liberty of conscience, made at the cost of his life, has come to be widely accepted, including by the Catholic Church at the Second Vatican Council (Dignitatis Humanae, 1965), and the historic churches now acknowledge their own past persecution of dissenters.
His doctrine of baptism and the Church, however, departs from the historic faith. The creeds confess "one baptism", which the Church had given to infants since the earliest centuries; to declare all such baptisms void, and to restore baptism by the decision of a small group of believers, assumes that the Church had ceased to exist - a conclusion the Lord's promise forbids (Matthew 16:18; 28:20). The judgement that a church of a few dozen could excommunicate the rest, and the speed with which the founding congregation divided, illustrate the difficulty that follows when there is no Church beyond the local congregation to which an appeal can be made.
Major writings
- A Declaration of Faith of English People Remaining at Amsterdam in Holland (1611)
- An Advertisement or Admonition unto the Congregations, which Men Call the New Fryelers (1611)
- A Short and Plain Proof by the Word and Works of God that God's Decree is not the Cause of any Man's Sin (1611)
- A Short Declaration of the Mystery of Iniquity (1612)
Answering a modern Christian
"The Lord's Supper is just a memorial. Jesus said, 'Do this in remembrance of me.'" He did, and the four traditions agree that the Supper is a remembrance. But in the Bible, remembering is not merely thinking about the past. At Passover, Israel "remembered" the Exodus by eating the meal that made each generation part of it. Paul, who reports "do this in remembrance of me", also says the bread "is the communion of the body of Christ" and warns that eating unworthily makes one "guilty of the body and blood of the Lord". That is not how one speaks of a symbol. And every Christian writer of the early centuries speaks of the Eucharist as Christ's body and blood.
"Jesus also said 'I am the door' and 'I am the vine'. He talks in metaphors." He does. But at the Last Supper He did not say "I am the bread". He took bread and said "this is my body". In John 6, when His hearers took Him literally and were offended, He did not correct them; He repeated it more strongly, and many left Him. No one leaves a teacher over a metaphor.
"We worship the way the New Testament commands, without man-made traditions." Ask what the New Testament commands about the order of service, the songs, the number of sermons, the time of meeting, the use of instruments, or the frequency of communion. Very little. Every church fills that gap with traditions of its own; the question is only whose. The four traditions fill it with the shape of worship that can be traced to the second century. A church founded in the last two hundred years fills it with a tradition of its own making.
"Baptists go back to the New Testament, not to a sixteenth-century movement." The Baptist churches can be traced with unusual precision. The first was founded by John Smyth, a Church of England clergyman, who baptised himself in Amsterdam in 1609 because he believed no church on earth had valid baptism, and who then doubted what he had done. Some Baptists have argued for an unbroken "trail of blood" of Baptist churches back to the apostles; Baptist historians themselves have generally abandoned the claim, because the evidence does not support it.†
Work with it
Check yourself
Who taught that "this is my body" means "this signifies my body"?
-
Calvin rejected Zwingli's bare memorialism and taught a true, spiritual feeding on Christ's body and blood.
-
Correct. Zwingli adopted Hoen's reading around 1524 and abolished the Mass in Zürich at Easter 1525.
-
Luther wrote "Hoc est corpus meum" on the table at Marburg and would not move from the plain words.
-
Ignatius calls the Eucharist "the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ".
Check yourself
What happened at the Marburg Colloquy in 1529?
-
Marburg was a Protestant meeting.
-
They did not.
-
Yes. The fifteenth article recorded the disagreement, and the two sides never united.
-
Those are English, from 1563-71.
Check yourself
How did the first Baptist church begin?
-
Correct. Thomas Helwys brought the group back to London in 1612.
-
Baptist historians themselves have largely abandoned this claim.
-
Luther upheld infant baptism.
-
Dort was a Reformed synod and upheld infant baptism.
Check yourself
Which Anglican article says the sacraments are "not only badges or tokens of Christian men's profession"?
-
Article VI is on the sufficiency of Scripture.
-
Article XI is on justification.
-
Right. It calls them "certain sure witnesses, and effectual signs of grace" - a direct answer to the memorial view.
-
Article XXXIX is on oaths.
Objection drill
Christ's body ascended into heaven and is at the right hand of the Father. A body by definition is in one place. So it cannot be on thousands of altars at once - the real presence is simply a physical impossibility, and Zwingli was being reasonable.
A model answer
This was exactly Zwingli's argument at Marburg, and it has real force for anyone who thinks of Christ's risen body as an ordinary body located in space.
But the four traditions all deny that premise. The risen Christ's body is a true body, but not an ordinary one: it passed through closed doors, appeared and vanished, and was not recognised until He chose to be recognised. "The right hand of God" is not a place in the sky; it is God's power and rule, which is everywhere.
The objection also proves too much. If reason may rule out what Christ says because it seems physically impossible, the same reasoning rules out the virgin birth, the resurrection, and the Incarnation itself - God in a manger. Luther saw this at once. Christ's words, "this is my body", are the starting point; the question is how they are true, not whether.
The four explain it differently. Catholics speak of transubstantiation; the Orthodox of a change they decline to define; Lutherans of Christ's body "in, with and under" the bread; Anglicans of a real partaking of Christ's body. But all four reject the claim that the bread is only a sign, and all four can point to the Fathers, who spoke the same way: "the Eucharist is the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ."
Memory work
Turn each card over, then say honestly whether you knew it. Cards you miss come back sooner.